Five Basic Steps for Nonviolent Action
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
– Mahatma Gandhi
“We will take direct action against injustice without waiting for other agencies to act. We will not obey unjust laws or submit to unjust practices. We will do this peacefully, openly, cheerfully because our aim is to persuade. We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself. We will try to persuade with our words, but if our words fail, we will try to persuade with our acts. We will always be willing to talk and seek fair compromise, but we are ready to suffer when necessary and even risk our lives to become witness to the truth as we see it.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
1. Never dehumanize anyone. Try to understand the real needs of your opponents. Always remember that they are human beings too; in fact the more you respect your opponent as a human being, the more effectively you will be able to change their unjust ways — and defend your own ideals. Harm no one: your struggle is with the problem, not the person. Violence begets violence: “Hate can never overcome hate, only love can do that” (Martin Luther King, Jr.) Never harm another’s dignity — or accept harm to your own. “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” (MLK, Jr.) Indeed, the power of nonviolence is that it offers everyone a way back to dignity. A Tagalog word for their ‘people power’ in the Philippine uprising of 1986 was alay dangal, ‘to offer dignity.’
2. Your means are your ends. If your thoughts, words, and actions are nonviolent to the greatest extent possible the result will always be positive. As Gandhi said, “violent revolution will bring violent independence.”
3. Patience. An Arabic word for nonviolence is sabr ‘patience.’ Patience with insults you must endure, patience to contain your anger (or fear), patience because in nonviolence the results of your actions may be far off. In nonviolence it is often possible to lose the battle but go on to win the war. And the real ‘win’ we are reaching for is to win over the hearts and minds of even the most opposed. At the same time, know that there is always a solution that will benefit all parties: the way to help an oppressor, as the Prophet said, is to prevent him from oppressing.
4. Constructive Program. In between protests & boycotts, know what programs you can carry out to create the relationships you want to see in your community. You can ‘cooperate with good’ and ‘non-cooperate with evil’. Having both ready and knowing when to emphasize which approach gives great power. In general, be constructive when you can, obstructive when you must. In this connection, do not rely overly on things or tactics that are only symbolic. Be concrete, constructive, compassionate. Create parallel institutions to replace the ones you overthrow — before you overthrow them. It will be easier!
5. Swadeshi|Localism. Gandhi called this “swadeshi“. First solve the problems that you are closest to, both geographically and as an individual, before getting involved in the struggles of others. If you focus your efforts there you will find that your circle of influence expands.
My best thoughts on how to create a revolution have evolved to this:
http://www.counterpunch.org/garcia11212007.html
In essence, live a life of meaning, which requires coming to terms with death. My earlier ideas on “making revolution” were more political and however “kinder and gentler,” they were still ultimately conspiratorial schemes for generating coups. Authentic revolutions cannot be imposed (always for our own good, their elites tell us), they have to well up through popular consciousness. MG, Jr.
“Revolution” verses “Evolution”
Please allow me to humbly preface my remarks with a quote from Dr. King:
“Gandhi was inevitable. If humanity is to progress, Gandhi is inescapable. He lived, thought and acted, inspired by the vision of humanity evolving toward a world of peace and harmony.”
Your five steps to nonviolent action are thoughtful and practical (as is all information I find on your website/blog). I would, however, ask that you reconsider the use of the term “Revolution.” The context would make it a term of sociology. In sociology, the difference between the terms “Social Revolution” and “Social Evolution” is that the former is almost always accomplished through violence and the later though peaceful means. Following your five steps would lead, I think, to the evolution of our humanity.
I offer the following poem for thought:
Welcome To The Evolution
Raise Up! The evolution has begun!
The quiet tune that has through time been sung
Now calls to dance a Turning world that’s heard
The music but has not evolved as one.
We sing an evolutionary air,
Not revolutionary. War forswear
And raise, not rise. Raise up all men as one
And be of those a path a peace prepare.
We sing a song of non-violent, well informed,
Engaged, determined, deft, conjointly formed
And conscious social evolution. Sing
And dance with us—the world will be transformed.
Our songs all celebrate our strengths, not might:
For now it’s strengths, not might, that will unite
The world to raise the consciousness of Man
And bring a peace we all can share as right.
We sing to help evolve our current world.
We sing to help create a better world.
So hark the universal tune that plays
Through time and calls for souls to be unfurled.
The tune is here; the chime was struck when time
Began and plays through every paradigm.
Our songs all voice our passion strong that Man
One day will raise himself and be sublime.
So sing your song in harmony and we
Will touch upon the universal key
That will unite our bodies, minds and souls
To raise and make of each a Satyagrahi.
But songs are not enough: we must all dance!
We must all move if we would all advance.
But not in step: we flow in harmony.
One tune: to each his song; to each his dance.
In dance we know no enemies, just those
Who fail to heed the tune and thrash in throes
Of disharmonic, egocentric sound.
Where we hear rhyme and rhythm, they hear prose.
We can’t ignore the voice of those who fail
To hear the universal tune and wail
For more, more, more for me, me, me! We must
Confess our fears if we would grace prevail.
Those who refuse to hear—or who reject—
The call to raise, we must not leave unchecked.
But we must not those demonize whom we
Would hope to educate and reconnect.
If we would make a lasting peace we must
Make peace with those who make the wars. A just
And lasting peace all men includes. It must
Include all men; it must be built on trust.
We trust that all will raise Mankind if all
Are taught—not told or shown—but taught that all
Can live and work in peace and liberty.
We need the will; we have the wherewithal.
We have been told and shown and taught the way.
Mahatmas past and present played our ney.
Mahatmas past and present whirled Sema.
Mahatmas past and present guide today.
As all Great Souls have done, so, too, must we
Agree that Man—by nature or decree—
Is more than bone and blood. We all have souls.
We all are spirits. Man’s a mystery!
As all Great Souls, we, too, must understand:
As souls, as spirits, we as equals stand.
Each man, woman, and child is sacrosanct.
Awake to this, compassion will expand
Beyond the limits set by sight, or Man-
Made creeds, or borders. Man will not just scan
The egocentric, ethnocentric spheres;
From soul the whole he’ll start to sense and pan.
So let us sing our songs in harmony
That we might draw all men through euphony,
Especially those who have not been heard,
Whose voice has been left out of the symphony.
To raise the consciousness of Man we need
Agape love, not forced by rule or creed,
But stirred to life by song and moved by dance.
That’s why our songs to harmony must heed.
Agape love will change our dance; we will
Create sustainable systems. We will
Create social and economical
Ecosystems. We’ll make compassion spill!
We’ll start with silence. Silence will allow
The harmony that flows within the Toa
To be perceived. Perception here of Voice
Will quicken us—and faith to us endow.
This faith will change our paradigm. Instead
Of glorifying gods of war we’ll shed
Our light on Sufis, Saints, Non-violent Guides—
All those who’ve served or for our cause have bled.
Endowed with faith our faith becomes our care.
We’ll cultivate our faith with love and prayer.
We’ll daily meditate on a global peace
And harmony of all we can declare.
We’ll then declare our faith and love in song.
We’ll sing in harmony, with faith that’s strong,
To help Mankind evolve and see himself
As paladin of all, for all belong.
Our songs will guide our dance. This life of art
Will evolutionize ourselves to start.
(All change begins within ourselves.) This art
Will wisdom both within and out impart.
This art will energize our souls and drive
Our dance to public spheres where souls can thrive
On service. Bolstered bold by inner strength,
Our service will in turn our souls revive.
This art will draw all those who will linkup
Their song, their dance—their art—to help makeup
A movement vibrant now with heroic sound:
Raise up! Raise up! The world we will Raise Up!
Metta team,
You all know me and know that I agree with the perspective in this post, but I believe there is something very crucial that is missing. Why do we need a social revolution or, as M J Frost so eloquently puts it, a social evolution? What is so bad about the world and our institutions that we need a change?
Now you know me and know that I have answers to these questions, and I know all of you have answers. The problem I am realizing is that not everyone in this country believes there is a need for radical change, social evolution, or whatever label you want to apply. I know that if we are going to achieve the change we are looking for, everyone must be on board with wanting the change. For that to happen people must agree that there is a grave danger facing humanity and change needs to happen. Perhaps starting to put it into words would be of great help.
Is it consumerism?
I know many people who love their stuff and have told me that they would not want to part with their consumer crap which I believe is destroying the planet and creating mindless zombies out of humans who are forced to work most of the day at jobs they do not like simply to try and live and be happy (http://www.storyofstuff.org). It would be hard to convince these people to abandon their consumer lives even with an awesome animated short narrated by Annie Leonard.
Is it militarism?
I know many people who honestly believe that war is needed to keep people safe. People who believe deterrence is a good idea and that we should continue to build better and more sophisticated weaponry in order to keep this country safe. It would be hard to convince these people that war is plaguing humanity especially when there souls are not touched by the untold millions murdered by the American military industrial complex.
Is it capitalism?
I think it feeds greed and immoral business, but I am not sure that even everyone at the Metta Center agrees with me on this, let alone all the people who still think the American Dream is not a fallacy.
Peace and Love,
Jason
p.s.
I have one other small critique. Keep in mind I love you all and all your brilliant minds and loving hearts and am only being critical because I care so much about the world and want to be there hand in hand helping to start the (R)evolution. You know me well and obviously I have issue with number four. “In general, be constructive when you can, obstructive when you must.” When is the time for obstructive programs? When is the time for dismantling the almost 10,000 nuclear warheads in the US arsenal? When is the time for tearing down the prisons that hold our black brothers for nonviolent crimes? When is the time for changing our government that constantly lies to its own people, even in the light of this new “transparent” executive branch. What is the constructive program to address these atrocities and the many more I am leaving out? I am trying to be patient, but when is the time that we must obstruct these crimes against nature and humanity? It seems like the time is a long time coming and sometimes I wonder if it the time for change has past, and our destructive ways will soon lead to our destruction. Number two right?