[…] I do almost stop to listen, and sometimes it sets off some random thoughts. A case in point are the “hope tank” talks from the Metta Centre. This second example of this innovation is even better since the conversation […]
It seems to me that in regard to the posited three physical conditions that life and consciousness should be more explicitly stated. I know from Michael Nagler’s point of view this proposition is limiting, but for me it opens up a path to understanding consciousness. For one, it connects consciousness to growth, and thus to potentiality as distinct from realization. What do you think?
[…] I do almost stop to listen, and sometimes it sets off some random thoughts. A case in point are the “hope tank” talks from the Metta Centre. This second example of this innovation is even better since the conversation […]
It seems to me that in regard to the posited three physical conditions that life and consciousness should be more explicitly stated. I know from Michael Nagler’s point of view this proposition is limiting, but for me it opens up a path to understanding consciousness. For one, it connects consciousness to growth, and thus to potentiality as distinct from realization. What do you think?