“I would use the most deadly weapons, if I believed that they would destroy it [the British Raj]. I refrain only because the use of such weapons would only perpetuate the system though it may destroy its present administrators.” ~ Gandhi, Young India, 17-3-1927, p. 85
It would be hard to think of a more important piece of wisdom for those of us today who may be contemplating what has come to be called a “diversity of tactics,” which is a euphemism for using “some” violence in an otherwise non-violent action. How many examples have we seen, tragically, of both the confusion of an otherwise non-violent action (think of Seattle in 1999) and of getting autocrats out of power through violence only to see different “administrators” come in to take their place?
Thanks for sharing a comment below.
About Daily Metta
Stephanie Van Hook, the Metta Center’s executive director, launched Daily Metta in 2015 as a way to share Gandhi’s spiritual wisdom and experiments with nonviolence.
Our 2016 Daily Metta continues with Gandhi on weekdays. On weekends, we share videos that complement Michael Nagler’s award-winning book, The Search for a Nonviolent Future: A Promise of Peace for Ourselves, Our Families, and Our World. To help readers engage with the book more deeply, the Metta Center offers a free PDF study guide.
Enjoy more Daily Metta: See the archives
Get Daily Metta by email: Subscribe
To say that an action can mix violent with nonviolent means and still be called nonviolent is pure dishonesty. Violence is like the leaven a woman hid in three measures of meal: the whole is leavened by it. Just as a woman cannot be a little bit pregnant, an action cannot be a little bit violent.